↓ Skip to main content

A cross-sectional study of maternal perception of fetal movements and antenatal advice in a general pregnant population, using a qualitative framework

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A cross-sectional study of maternal perception of fetal movements and antenatal advice in a general pregnant population, using a qualitative framework
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-13-32
Pubmed ID
Authors

Camille H Raynes-Greenow, Adrienne Gordon, Qiushuang Li, Jon A Hyett

Abstract

Maternal perception of fetal movements has been used as a measure of fetal well-being. Yet a Cochrane review does not recommend formal fetal movement counting compared to discretional fetal movement counting. There is some evidence that suggests that the quality of fetal movements can precede quantitative changes however there has been almost no assessment of how women describe movements and whether these descriptions may be useful in a clinical setting. Therefore we aimed to examine maternal perception of fetal movements using a qualitative framework.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 98 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 19%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 28 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Psychology 4 4%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 30 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2018.
All research outputs
#6,495,853
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#1,787
of 4,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,359
of 288,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#38
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.