↓ Skip to main content

Survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer without treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer without treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Systematic Reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/2046-4053-2-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hesborn Wao, Rahul Mhaskar, Ambuj Kumar, Branko Miladinovic, Benjamin Djulbegovic

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Haiti 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 109 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 21%
Student > Master 20 18%
Researcher 19 17%
Student > Bachelor 17 15%
Other 9 8%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 8 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 7%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 14 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2021.
All research outputs
#907,349
of 19,787,208 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#146
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,093
of 267,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,787,208 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them