The contribution of databases to the results of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, September 2016

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 2,232)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs: 3 blogs

twitter: 91 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation: 76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley: 140 Mendeley
citeulike: 2 CiteULike

Summary Blogs X Dimensions citations

So far, Altmetric has seen 3 posts from 3 blogs.

A new method for testing reproducibility in systematic reviews was developed, but needs more testing

eproduciblescience.org, 04 Aug 2021

We have developed an approach to test reproducibility retrospectively while focusing on the whole conduct of an SR instead of…

How Many Databases Are Needed for a Systematic Review or Meta-analysis?

The Amazing World of Psychiatry: A Psychiatry Blog, 18 Dec 2016

Researchers Adjunct Professor Lisa Hartling, Robin Featherstone, Megan Nuspl, Kassi Shave, Dr Donna M. Dryden and Ben…

BMC Medical Research Methodology: Highlights of 2016

BMC series blog, 16 Dec 2016

A software tool to help tackle global health inequality: Health Equity Assessment Toolkit (HEAT) In an effort to fight global…

This page shows the most recent blog posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity.