You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The four serotypes of dengue recognize the same putative receptors in Aedes aegypti midgut and Ae. albopictus cells
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Microbiology, October 2006
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2180-6-85 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ricardo F Mercado-Curiel, Héctor Armando Esquinca-Avilés, Rosalinda Tovar, Álvaro Díaz-Badillo, Minerva Camacho-Nuez, María de Lourdes Muñoz |
Abstract |
Dengue viruses (DENV) attach to the host cell surface and subsequently enter the cell by receptor-mediated endocytosis. Several primary and low affinity co-receptors for this flavivirus have been identified. However, the presence of these binding molecules on the cell surface does not necessarily render the cell susceptible to infection. Determination of which of them serve as bona fide receptors for this virus in the vector may be relevant to treating DENV infection and in designing control strategies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 2% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 115 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 20% |
Researcher | 23 | 19% |
Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 7% |
Other | 24 | 20% |
Unknown | 14 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 43% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 16% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 9% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 6% |
Unknown | 19 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2013.
All research outputs
#15,262,171
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#1,756
of 3,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,177
of 67,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,170 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.