↓ Skip to main content

Did genome duplication drive the origin of teleosts? A comparative study of diversification in ray-finned fishes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Evolutionary Biology, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
231 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
350 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Did genome duplication drive the origin of teleosts? A comparative study of diversification in ray-finned fishes
Published in
BMC Evolutionary Biology, August 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-9-194
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesco Santini, Luke J Harmon, Giorgio Carnevale, Michael E Alfaro

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 350 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 14 4%
United Kingdom 6 2%
Brazil 4 1%
Canada 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Other 9 3%
Unknown 306 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 101 29%
Researcher 74 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 33 9%
Student > Master 32 9%
Student > Bachelor 25 7%
Other 60 17%
Unknown 25 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 249 71%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 12%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 3%
Environmental Science 10 3%
Computer Science 3 <1%
Other 8 2%
Unknown 27 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2016.
All research outputs
#7,292,948
of 8,440,126 outputs
Outputs from BMC Evolutionary Biology
#1,894
of 2,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,353
of 252,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Evolutionary Biology
#76
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,440,126 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,021 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.