↓ Skip to main content

Did genome duplication drive the origin of teleosts? A comparative study of diversification in ray-finned fishes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
253 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
367 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Did genome duplication drive the origin of teleosts? A comparative study of diversification in ray-finned fishes
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, August 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-9-194
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesco Santini, Luke J Harmon, Giorgio Carnevale, Michael E Alfaro

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 367 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 4%
United Kingdom 6 2%
Brazil 4 1%
Canada 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Other 9 2%
Unknown 324 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 101 28%
Researcher 80 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 33 9%
Student > Master 31 8%
Student > Bachelor 28 8%
Other 61 17%
Unknown 33 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 248 68%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 47 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 3%
Environmental Science 10 3%
Computer Science 3 <1%
Other 10 3%
Unknown 37 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2016.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#3,511
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,562
of 123,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#43
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.