You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
In-line filtration minimizes organ dysfunction: New aspects from a prospective, randomized, controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Pediatrics, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2431-13-21 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Martin Boehne, Thomas Jack, Harald Köditz, Kathrin Seidemann, Florian Schmidt, Michaela Abura, Harald Bertram, Michael Sasse |
Abstract |
Infused particles induce thrombogenesis, impair microcirculation and modulate immune response. We have previously shown in critically ill children, that particle-retentive in-line filtration reduced the overall complication rate of severe events, length of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation. We now evaluated the influence of in-line filtration on different organ function and thereby elucidated the potential underlying pathophysiological effects of particle infusion. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 85 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
Researcher | 12 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Other | 19 | 22% |
Unknown | 17 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 49% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 11% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 10% |
Unknown | 19 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2013.
All research outputs
#18,616,159
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#2,364
of 3,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,208
of 288,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#29
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.