↓ Skip to main content

Multidimensionality and scale in a landscape ethnoecological partitioning of a mountainous landscape (Gyimes, Eastern Carpathians, Romania)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multidimensionality and scale in a landscape ethnoecological partitioning of a mountainous landscape (Gyimes, Eastern Carpathians, Romania)
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-9-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dániel Babai, Zsolt Molnár

Abstract

Traditional habitat knowledge is an understudied part of traditional knowledge. Though the number of studies increased world-wide in the last decade, this knowledge is still rarely studied in Europe. We document the habitat vocabulary used by Csángó people, and determine features they used to name and describe these categories.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 71 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 13%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 29%
Environmental Science 23 29%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 16 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2017.
All research outputs
#8,183,680
of 24,532,617 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#341
of 765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,149
of 292,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#12
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,532,617 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.