You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Atlas of human African trypanosomiasis: a contribution to global mapping of neglected tropical diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Health Geographics, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1476-072x-9-57 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pere P Simarro, Giuliano Cecchi, Massimo Paone, José R Franco, Abdoulaye Diarra, José A Ruiz, Eric M Fèvre, Fabrice Courtin, Raffaele C Mattioli, Jean G Jannin |
| Abstract |
Following World Health Assembly resolutions 50.36 in 1997 and 56.7 in 2003, the World Health Organization (WHO) committed itself to supporting human African trypanosomiasis (HAT)-endemic countries in their efforts to remove the disease as a public health problem. Mapping the distribution of HAT in time and space has a pivotal role to play if this objective is to be met. For this reason WHO launched the HAT Atlas initiative, jointly implemented with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, in the framework of the Programme Against African Trypanosomosis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 453 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 2 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 2 | <1% |
| Kenya | 2 | <1% |
| Uganda | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Senegal | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 435 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 92 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 89 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 59 | 13% |
| Researcher | 57 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 4% |
| Other | 67 | 15% |
| Unknown | 70 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 131 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 48 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 25 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 79 | 17% |
| Unknown | 82 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,570,672
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Geographics
#53
of 627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,850
of 100,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Geographics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them