↓ Skip to main content

Rome consensus conference - statement; human papilloma virus diseases in males

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rome consensus conference - statement; human papilloma virus diseases in males
Published in
BMC Public Health, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Lenzi, Vincenzo Mirone, Vincenzo Gentile, Riccardo Bartoletti, Vincenzo Ficarra, Carlo Foresta, Luciano Mariani, Sandra Mazzoli, Saverio G Parisi, Antonio Perino, Mauro Picardo, Carla Maria Zotti

Abstract

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is a very resistant, ubiquitous virus that can survive in the environment without a host. The decision to analyse HPV-related diseases in males was due to the broad dissemination of the virus, and, above all, by the need to stress the importance of primary and secondary prevention measures (currently available for women exclusively). The objective of the Consensus Conference was to make evidence-based recommendations that were designed to facilitate the adoption of a standard approach in clinical practice in Italy.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 102 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 19%
Student > Master 13 12%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Other 21 20%
Unknown 21 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Psychology 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 27 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2020.
All research outputs
#3,717,305
of 21,777,067 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,131
of 14,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,473
of 281,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,777,067 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,121 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.