↓ Skip to main content

Rome consensus conference - statement; human papilloma virus diseases in males

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rome consensus conference - statement; human papilloma virus diseases in males
Published in
BMC Public Health, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Lenzi, Vincenzo Mirone, Vincenzo Gentile, Riccardo Bartoletti, Vincenzo Ficarra, Carlo Foresta, Luciano Mariani, Sandra Mazzoli, Saverio G Parisi, Antonio Perino, Mauro Picardo, Carla Maria Zotti

Abstract

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is a very resistant, ubiquitous virus that can survive in the environment without a host. The decision to analyse HPV-related diseases in males was due to the broad dissemination of the virus, and, above all, by the need to stress the importance of primary and secondary prevention measures (currently available for women exclusively). The objective of the Consensus Conference was to make evidence-based recommendations that were designed to facilitate the adoption of a standard approach in clinical practice in Italy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 114 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 18%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 27 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 33 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2023.
All research outputs
#4,438,613
of 24,089,177 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,989
of 15,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,110
of 290,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#72
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,089,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.