You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Snpdat: Easy and rapid annotation of results from de novo snp discovery projects for model and non-model organisms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-14-45 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anthony G Doran, Christopher J Creevey |
| Abstract |
Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are the most abundant genetic variant found in vertebrates and invertebrates. SNP discovery has become a highly automated, robust and relatively inexpensive process allowing the identification of many thousands of mutations for model and non-model organisms. Annotating large numbers of SNPs can be a difficult and complex process. Many tools available are optimised for use with organisms densely sampled for SNPs, such as humans. There are currently few tools available that are species non-specific or support non-model organism data. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| Germany | 1 | 13% |
| China | 1 | 13% |
| Norway | 1 | 13% |
| France | 1 | 13% |
| Poland | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 63% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Ghana | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 82 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 9 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 55% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 19% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2017.
All research outputs
#4,433,373
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#1,668
of 7,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,730
of 289,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#30
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.