You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility evaluation of individual vs. group transdiagnostic psychological treatment for emotional disorders in primary care (PsicAP-Costs): a multicentre randomized controlled trial protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12888-022-03726-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ángel Aguilera-Martín, Mario Gálvez-Lara, Fátima Cuadrado, Eliana Moreno, Francisco García-Torres, José F. Venceslá, Jorge Corpas, Francisco J. Jurado-González, Roger Muñoz-Navarro, César González-Blanch, Paloma Ruiz-Rodríguez, Sara Barrio-Martínez, Maider Prieto-Vila, María Carpallo-González, Antonio Cano-Vindel, Juan A. Moriana |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 47 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 15 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 49 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2022.
All research outputs
#13,313,060
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,792
of 4,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,513
of 519,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#80
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.