↓ Skip to main content

From causes to solutions - insights from lay knowledge about health inequalities

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
From causes to solutions - insights from lay knowledge about health inequalities
Published in
BMC Public Health, January 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-67
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine Putland, Fran E Baum, Anna M Ziersch

Abstract

This paper reports on a qualitative study of lay knowledge about health inequalities and solutions to address them. Social determinants of health are responsible for a large proportion of health inequalities (unequal levels of health status) and inequities (unfair access to health services and resources) within and between countries. Despite an expanding evidence base supporting action on social determinants, understanding of the impact of these determinants is not widespread and political will appears to be lacking. A small but growing body of research has explored how ordinary people theorise health inequalities and the implications for taking action. The findings are variable, however, in terms of an emphasis on structure versus individual agency and the relationship between being 'at risk' and acceptance of social/structural explanations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 104 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Researcher 11 10%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 27 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 23 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 11%
Psychology 8 7%
Environmental Science 4 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 39 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2023.
All research outputs
#5,573,565
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,463
of 15,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,834
of 185,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#37
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.