You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chronic disease and sitting time in middle-aged Australian males: findings from the 45 and Up Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5868-10-20 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emma S George, Richard R Rosenkranz, Gregory S Kolt |
| Abstract |
Compared to females, males experience a range of health inequities including higher rates of diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Although sitting time is emerging as a distinct risk factor for chronic disease, research on the association of sitting time and chronic disease in middle-aged Australian males is limited. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 11% |
| Australia | 4 | 8% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 70% |
| Scientists | 7 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 136 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 11% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 29 | 20% |
| Unknown | 25 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 9% |
| Psychology | 12 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 31 | 21% |
| Unknown | 30 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 242. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2019.
All research outputs
#157,037
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#34
of 2,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#980
of 293,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.