You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
NK cell frequencies, function and correlates to vaccine outcome in BNT162b2 mRNA anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated healthy and immunocompromised individuals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Molecular Medicine, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s10020-022-00443-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Angelica Cuapio, Caroline Boulouis, Iva Filipovic, David Wullimann, Tobias Kammann, Tiphaine Parrot, Puran Chen, Mira Akber, Yu Gao, Quirin Hammer, Benedikt Strunz, André Pérez Potti, Olga Rivera Ballesteros, Joshua Lange, Jagadeeswara Rao Muvva, Peter Bergman, Ola Blennow, Lotta Hansson, Stephan Mielke, Piotr Nowak, Gunnar Söderdahl, Anders Österborg, C. I. Edvard Smith, Gordana Bogdanovic, Sandra Muschiol, Fredrika Hellgren, Karin Loré, Michal J. Sobkowiak, Giorgio Gabarrini, Katie Healy, Margaret Sällberg Chen, Evren Alici, Niklas K. Björkström, Marcus Buggert, Per Ljungman, Johan K. Sandberg, Soo Aleman, Hans-Gustaf Ljunggren |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 8% |
| France | 4 | 6% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| Sweden | 3 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 48 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 62 | 86% |
| Scientists | 6 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 24 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,064,149
of 25,746,891 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Medicine
#32
of 1,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,177
of 524,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Medicine
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,746,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 524,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.