You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing the effect of an educational intervention on early childhood development among Mexican preschool children in the state of Oaxaca: a study protocol of a cluster randomized stepped-wedge trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13063-022-06024-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amado D. Quezada-Sánchez, Evelyn Fuentes-Rivera, Angélica García-Martínez, María del Carmen Hernández-Chávez, Carlos Pineda-Antúnez, Martín Romero Martínez, Armando García-Guerra, Raquel García-Feregrino, Abby Madrigal-Ramírez, Tania Santiago-Angelino, Fabián Olvera-Flores, Lourdes Schnaas, Rafael Pérez-Escamilla, Edson Serván-Mori |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 8 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 13% |
| Psychology | 3 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 9 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2022.
All research outputs
#15,542,250
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#4,116
of 5,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,613
of 509,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#105
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.