↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Identification and validation of the high expression of pseudogene TCAM1P in cervical cancer via integrated bioinformatics analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Cell International, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction to: Identification and validation of the high expression of pseudogene TCAM1P in cervical cancer via integrated bioinformatics analysis
Published in
Cancer Cell International, February 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12935-022-02516-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuanhang Zhu, Chenchen Ren, Li Yang, Zhenan Zhang, Meiyuan Gong, Kebing Chen

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2022.
All research outputs
#3,846,757
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Cell International
#345
of 1,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,075
of 514,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Cell International
#81
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,827 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 514,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.