You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An implementation research agenda
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-4-18 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin P Eccles, David Armstrong, Richard Baker, Kevin Cleary, Huw Davies, Stephen Davies, Paul Glasziou, Irene Ilott, Ann-Louise Kinmonth, Gillian Leng, Stuart Logan, Theresa Marteau, Susan Michie, Hugh Rogers, Jo Rycroft-Malone, Bonnie Sibbald |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 404 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 2% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 378 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 80 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 71 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 59 | 15% |
| Other | 33 | 8% |
| Professor | 26 | 6% |
| Other | 98 | 24% |
| Unknown | 37 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 100 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 73 | 18% |
| Psychology | 51 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 47 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 52 | 13% |
| Unknown | 67 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2017.
All research outputs
#3,023,999
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#668
of 1,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,241
of 94,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.