↓ Skip to main content

An implementation research agenda

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
354 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
391 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An implementation research agenda
Published in
Implementation Science, April 2009
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-4-18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin P Eccles, David Armstrong, Richard Baker, Kevin Cleary, Huw Davies, Stephen Davies, Paul Glasziou, Irene Ilott, Ann-Louise Kinmonth, Gillian Leng, Stuart Logan, Theresa Marteau, Susan Michie, Hugh Rogers, Jo Rycroft-Malone, Bonnie Sibbald

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 391 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 10 3%
United States 3 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 365 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 80 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 18%
Student > Master 56 14%
Other 33 8%
Professor 26 7%
Other 93 24%
Unknown 33 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 25%
Social Sciences 71 18%
Psychology 51 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 46 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 3%
Other 51 13%
Unknown 62 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2017.
All research outputs
#2,557,143
of 20,283,653 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#641
of 1,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,753
of 207,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,283,653 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them