↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic accuracy of the neurological upper limb examination II: Relation to symptoms of patterns of findings

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neurology, February 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnostic accuracy of the neurological upper limb examination II: Relation to symptoms of patterns of findings
Published in
BMC Neurology, February 2006
DOI 10.1186/1471-2377-6-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jørgen R Jepsen, Lise H Laursen, Carl-Göran Hagert, Svend Kreiner, Anders I Larsen

Abstract

In a sample of patients in clinical occupational medicine we have demonstrated that an upper limb neurological examination can reliably identify patterns of findings suggesting upper limb focal neuropathies. This further study aimed at approaching the diagnostic accuracy of the examination.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 19%
Other 9 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Other 15 26%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 60%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 12%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Unspecified 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 8 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2016.
All research outputs
#7,424,121
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#839
of 2,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,571
of 71,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.