↓ Skip to main content

The impacts of faecal subsampling on microbial compositional profiling

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impacts of faecal subsampling on microbial compositional profiling
Published in
BMC Research Notes, February 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13104-022-05923-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanda J. Cox, Lily Hughes, Tiffanie M. Nelson, Kyle M. Hatton-Jones, Rebecca Ramsey, Allan W. Cripps, Nicholas P. West

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Lecturer 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2022.
All research outputs
#20,556,243
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#3,586
of 4,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#426,982
of 518,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#56
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.