↓ Skip to main content

Current management and prognostic factors in physiotherapy practice for patients with shoulder pain: design of a prospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Current management and prognostic factors in physiotherapy practice for patients with shoulder pain: design of a prospective cohort study
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-62
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yasmaine H J M Karel, Wendy G M Scholten-Peeters, Marloes Thoomes-de Graaf, Edwin Duijn, Ramon P G Ottenheijm, Maaike P J van den Borne, Bart W Koes, Arianne P Verhagen, Geert-Jan Dinant, Eric Tetteroo, Annechien Beumer, Joost B van Broekhoven, Marcel Heijmans

Abstract

Shoulder pain is disabling and has a considerable socio-economic impact. Over 50% of patients presenting in primary care still have symptoms after 6 months; moreover, prognostic factors such as pain intensity, age, disability level and duration of complaints are associated with poor outcome. Most shoulder complaints in this group are categorized as non-specific. Musculoskeletal ultrasound might be a useful imaging method to detect subgroups of patients with subacromial disorders.This article describes the design of a prospective cohort study evaluating the influence of known prognostic and possible prognostic factors, such as findings from musculoskeletal ultrasound outcome and working alliance, on the recovery of shoulder pain. Also, to assess the usual physiotherapy care for shoulder pain and examine the inter-rater reliability of musculoskeletal ultrasound between radiologists and physiotherapists for patients with shoulder pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 121 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 24%
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Researcher 9 7%
Other 5 4%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 30 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 17%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 34 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2013.
All research outputs
#8,250,094
of 25,539,438 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,592
of 4,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,959
of 297,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#34
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,539,438 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.