You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Learning curve of digital intraoral scanning – an in vivo study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Oral Health, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12903-020-01278-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ivett Róth, Alexandra Czigola, Gellért Levente Joós-Kovács, Magdolna Dalos, Péter Hermann, Judit Borbély |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 35 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 36% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 34 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,970,974
of 23,523,017 outputs
Outputs from BMC Oral Health
#73
of 1,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,356
of 420,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Oral Health
#4
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,523,017 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.