↓ Skip to main content

Food, fizzy, and football: promoting unhealthy food and beverages through sport - a New Zealand case study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
24 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Food, fizzy, and football: promoting unhealthy food and beverages through sport - a New Zealand case study
Published in
BMC Public Health, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-126
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary-Ann Carter, Louise Signal, Richard Edwards, Janet Hoek, Anthony Maher

Abstract

High participation rates in sport and increasing recognition of how diet benefits athletic performance suggest sports settings may be ideal locations for promoting healthy eating. While research has demonstrated the effect of tobacco and alcohol sponsorship on consumption, particularly among youth, few studies have examined the extent or impact of food and beverage company sponsorship in sport. Studies using brand logos as a measure suggest unhealthy foods and beverages dominate sports sponsorship. However, as marketing goes beyond the use of brand livery, research examining how marketers support sponsorships that create brand associations encouraging consumer purchase is also required. This study aimed to identify the characteristics and extent of sponsorships and associated marketing by food and non-alcoholic beverage brands and companies through a case study of New Zealand sport.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 170 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 22%
Student > Bachelor 29 17%
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Student > Postgraduate 12 7%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 38 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 14%
Social Sciences 21 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 15 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Sports and Recreations 13 8%
Other 40 24%
Unknown 45 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2023.
All research outputs
#958,313
of 23,972,269 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,031
of 15,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,776
of 294,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#7
of 285 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,972,269 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 285 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.