↓ Skip to main content

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy mimics: role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy mimics: role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-15-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giovanni Quarta, Syed I Husain, Andrew S Flett, Daniel M Sado, Charles Y Chao, Marıá T Tomé Esteban, William J McKenna, Antonios Pantazis, James C Moon

Abstract

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is commonly used in patients with suspected arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) based on ECG, echocardiogram and Holter. However, various diseases may present with clinical characteristics resembling ARVC causing diagnostic dilemmas. The aim of this study was to explore the role of CMR in the differential diagnosis of patients with suspected ARVC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 75 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 13 17%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 19 25%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 65%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Unknown 21 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2023.
All research outputs
#14,655,870
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#864
of 1,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,171
of 298,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#10
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.