You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Translational framework for implementation evaluation and research: a normalisation process theory coding manual for qualitative research and instrument development
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-022-01191-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carl R. May, Bianca Albers, Mike Bracher, Tracy L. Finch, Anthony Gilbert, Melissa Girling, Kathryn Greenwood, Anne MacFarlane, Frances S. Mair, Christine M. May, Elizabeth Murray, Sebastian Potthoff, Tim Rapley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 211 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 80 | 38% |
| United States | 16 | 8% |
| Australia | 13 | 6% |
| Ireland | 5 | 2% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| Singapore | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Curaçao | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Unknown | 71 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 95 | 45% |
| Members of the public | 86 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 27 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 148 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 54 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 20 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 10% |
| Psychology | 7 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 16% |
| Unknown | 58 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 131. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#323,672
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#16
of 1,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,494
of 453,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.