You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Safety and efficacy of a probiotic-containing infant formula supplemented with 2’-fucosyllactose: a double-blind randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-022-00764-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philippe Alliet, Yvan Vandenplas, Paola Roggero, Sabine N. J. Jespers, Stefaan Peeters, Jean-Philippe Stalens, Guus A. M. Kortman, Mailis Amico, Bernard Berger, Norbert Sprenger, Colin I. Cercamondi, Giovanni Corsello |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 74% |
| Scientists | 3 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 40 | 59% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 43 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,545,592
of 24,213,825 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#570
of 1,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,440
of 432,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,213,825 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.