You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Description of plant tRNA-derived RNA fragments (tRFs) associated with argonaute and identification of their putative targets
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biology Direct, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1745-6150-8-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guilherme Loss-Morais, Peter M Waterhouse, Rogerio Margis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 141 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 22% |
| Researcher | 30 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 14% |
| Unknown | 24 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 79 | 54% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 1% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2017.
All research outputs
#3,933,326
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from Biology Direct
#163
of 487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,957
of 287,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Direct
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.