You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Remote Assessment of Disease and Relapse in Major Depressive Disorder (RADAR-MDD): recruitment, retention, and data availability in a longitudinal remote measurement study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12888-022-03753-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Faith Matcham, Daniel Leightley, Sara Siddi, Femke Lamers, Katie M. White, Peter Annas, Giovanni de Girolamo, Sonia Difrancesco, Josep Maria Haro, Melany Horsfall, Alina Ivan, Grace Lavelle, Qingqin Li, Federica Lombardini, David C. Mohr, Vaibhav A. Narayan, Carolin Oetzmann, Brenda W. J. H. Penninx, Stuart Bruce, Raluca Nica, Sara K. Simblett, Til Wykes, Jens Christian Brasen, Inez Myin-Germeys, Aki Rintala, Pauline Conde, Richard J. B. Dobson, Amos A. Folarin, Callum Stewart, Yatharth Ranjan, Zulqarnain Rashid, Nick Cummins, Nikolay V. Manyakov, Srinivasan Vairavan, Matthew Hotopf |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 20% |
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| Belgium | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
| Researcher | 8 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 55 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 8 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 6% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 60 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,763,250
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#601
of 5,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,456
of 432,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#10
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,080 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.