↓ Skip to main content

A practical method to target individuals for outbreak detection and control

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A practical method to target individuals for outbreak detection and control
Published in
BMC Medicine, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-11-36
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerardo Chowell, Cécile Viboud

Abstract

Identification of individuals or subpopulations that contribute the most to disease transmission is key to target surveillance and control efforts. In a recent study in BMC Medicine, Smieszek and Salathé introduced a novel method based on readily available information about spatial proximity in high schools, to help identify individuals at higher risk of infection and those more likely to be infected early in the outbreak. By combining simulation models for influenza transmission with high-resolution data on school contact patterns, the authors showed that their proximity method compares favorably to more sophisticated methods using detailed contact tracing information. The proximity method is simple and promising, but further research is warranted to confront this method against real influenza outbreak data, and to assess the generalizability of the approach to other important transmission units, such as work, households, and transportation systems.See related research article here http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/11/35.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Cameroon 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Taiwan 1 3%
Vietnam 1 3%
Unknown 25 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Mathematics 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 5 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2013.
All research outputs
#486,558
of 11,109,604 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#471
of 1,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,469
of 313,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#31
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,109,604 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.