You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of ‘Shisha No Thanks’ – a co-design social marketing campaign on the harms of waterpipe smoking
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-022-12792-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lilian Chan, Nouhad El-Haddad, Becky Freeman, Ross MacKenzie, Lisa Woodland, Blythe J. O’Hara, Ben F. Harris-Roxas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 60% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 17% |
| Unknown | 17 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 4 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 18 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2022.
All research outputs
#7,858,600
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,664
of 17,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,866
of 454,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#226
of 478 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 478 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.