↓ Skip to main content

A proposal for reducing the effect of one of many causes of publication bias

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A proposal for reducing the effect of one of many causes of publication bias
Published in
Trials, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-14-41
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sue M Richards, Julie A Burrett

Abstract

In order to avoid publication bias, all trials should be registered at initiation and their results made easily accessible. However, some trial results are more difficult to publish than others. This report describes one such trial and highlights the need for a way of making results of trials widely available even if not presented in the traditional format. Until such time as it is required by law both to register all trials and enter their final results into the database, a lack of resources will mean that some trial results are never published. The scale of the problem of non-publication is unknown and for valid trial results any form of publication is better than none. Therefore it is essential that a quick and easy way is available to act as a safety net to catch trial results that would otherwise be lost.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 5%
Portugal 1 5%
Peru 1 5%
Unknown 18 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 14%
Professor 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Other 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Other 5 24%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 48%
Psychology 3 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 2 10%