↓ Skip to main content

Humoral immune response to HTLV-1 basic leucine zipper factor (HBZ) in HTLV-1-infected individuals

Overview of attention for article published in Retrovirology, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Humoral immune response to HTLV-1 basic leucine zipper factor (HBZ) in HTLV-1-infected individuals
Published in
Retrovirology, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1742-4690-10-19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoshimi Enose-Akahata, Anna Abrams, Raya Massoud, Izabela Bialuk, Kory R Johnson, Patrick L Green, Elizabeth M Maloney, Steven Jacobson

Abstract

Human T cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) infection can lead to development of adult T cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL) or HTLV-1-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis (HAM/TSP) in a subset of infected subjects. HTLV-1 basic leucine zipper factor (HBZ) gene has a critical role in HTLV-1 infectivity and the development of ATL and HAM/TSP. However, little is known about the immune response against HBZ in HTLV-1-infected individuals. In this study, we examined antibody responses against HBZ in serum/plasma samples from 436 subjects including HTLV-1 seronegative donors, asymptomatic carriers (AC), ATL, and HAM/TSP patients using the luciferase immunoprecipitation system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 48 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 20%
Student > Bachelor 10 20%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 6 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2013.
All research outputs
#19,945,185
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Retrovirology
#1,025
of 1,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,571
of 296,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Retrovirology
#17
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.