You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Toddler foods and milks don’t stack up against regular foods and milks
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, February 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12937-022-00765-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jennifer McCann, Kelsey Beckford, Holly Beswick, Melanie Chisholm, Julie Woods |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 9 | 24% |
Australia | 8 | 21% |
Mexico | 2 | 5% |
Ireland | 2 | 5% |
India | 1 | 3% |
Denmark | 1 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 11 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 21 | 55% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 39% |
Scientists | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 14% |
Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
Psychology | 1 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 90. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#477,166
of 25,529,543 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#150
of 1,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,206
of 451,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,529,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.