@TainaTuLa @LariHokkanen Tuo on pitkälti sama porukka, joka kritisoi Bonellin aloitetta jo 2013, mutta tällä kertaa Pawson puuttuu riveistä. Syy voi toki liittyä käytännön asioihin eikä näkemyseroihin. Tässä vielä Bonellin ym vastine Van Bellen ym artikkel
@dez_holmes @bethiamcneil @tim_hobbs_lab @tobyjlowe @LMsphsu 1. The most generative possibilities to date have been to think about whether 'realist' (https://t.co/pl36WYYdtt) or 'critical realist' (https://t.co/oThcw5KlzI) RCTs are possible.
RT @MedicalEvidence: The debate on realist trials has been hotly discussed via #Trialsjournal, inc https://t.co/5EtzbsKx6X & https://t.co/3…
RT @MedicalEvidence: The debate on realist trials has been hotly discussed via #Trialsjournal, inc https://t.co/5EtzbsKx6X & https://t.co/3…