You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Creatine supplementation enhances muscle force recovery after eccentrically-induced muscle damage in healthy individuals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1550-2783-6-13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew B Cooke, Emma Rybalka, Andrew D Williams, Paul J Cribb, Alan Hayes |
| Abstract |
Eccentric exercise-induced damage leads to reductions in muscle force, increased soreness, and impaired muscle function. Creatine monohydrate's (Cr) ergogenic potential is well established; however few studies have directly examined the effects of Cr supplementation on recovery after damage. We examined the effects of Cr supplementation on muscle proteins and force recovery after eccentrically-induced muscle damage in healthy individuals. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 43% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 20% |
| Scientists | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 236 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 8% |
| Researcher | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 33 | 14% |
| Unknown | 60 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 71 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 28 | 12% |
| Unknown | 69 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 90. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2024.
All research outputs
#476,208
of 25,610,986 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#143
of 950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,667
of 446,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#138
of 857 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,610,986 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 857 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.