↓ Skip to main content

Schistosomiasis vaccines: where do we stand?

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Schistosomiasis vaccines: where do we stand?
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13071-016-1799-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Biniam Mathewos Tebeje, Marina Harvie, Hong You, Alex Loukas, Donald P. McManus

Abstract

Schistosomiasis, caused mainly by S. mansoni, S. haematobium and S. japonicum, continues to be a serious tropical disease and public health problem resulting in an unacceptably high level of morbidity in countries where it is endemic. Praziquantel, the only drug currently available for treatment, is unable to kill developing schistosomes, it does not prevent re-infection and its continued extensive use may result in the future emergence of drug-resistant parasites. This scenario provides impetus for the development and deployment of anti-schistosome vaccines to be used as part of an integrated approach for the prevention, control and eventual elimination of schistosomiasis. This review considers the present status of candidate vaccines for schistosomiasis, and provides some insight on future vaccine discovery and design.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 225 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 19%
Student > Bachelor 36 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 15%
Student > Postgraduate 13 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 36 16%
Unknown 54 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 26 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 12%
Chemistry 11 5%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 64 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,825,125
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#571
of 5,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,776
of 324,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#7
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,582 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.