↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy and mechanisms of traditional Chinese medicine for COVID-19: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Chinese Medicine, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 541)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy and mechanisms of traditional Chinese medicine for COVID-19: a systematic review
Published in
Chinese Medicine, February 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13020-022-00587-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaomin Kang, De Jin, Linlin Jiang, Yuqing Zhang, Yuehong Zhang, Xuedong An, Liyun Duan, Cunqing Yang, Rongrong Zhou, Yingying Duan, Yuting Sun, Fengmei Lian

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 19%
Unspecified 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 9 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 24%
Unspecified 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 9 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,644,245
of 22,636,521 outputs
Outputs from Chinese Medicine
#22
of 541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,322
of 340,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chinese Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,636,521 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them