↓ Skip to main content

Dramatic reduction of mortality in pneumococcal meningitis

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dramatic reduction of mortality in pneumococcal meningitis
Published in
Critical Care, October 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13054-016-1498-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Grete Buchholz, Uwe Koedel, Hans-Walter Pfister, Stefan Kastenbauer, Matthias Klein

Abstract

Acute bacterial meningitis is still a life threatening disease. We performed a retrospective observational study on the clinical characteristics of consecutively admitted patients with acute pneumococcal meningitis in a single tertiary care center in central Europe (from 2003 until 2015). Data were compared with a previously published historical group of 87 patients treated for pneumococcal meningitis at the same hospital (from 1984 until 2002). Fifty-five consecutive patients with microbiologically proven pneumococcal meningitis were included. Most striking, mortality was down to 5.5 %, which was significantly lower than in the historical group where 24.1 % of the patients did not survive. Intracranial complications during the course of the disease were common and affected half of the patients. Unlike in the historic group, most of the intracranial complications (except ischemic stroke) were no longer associated with a low Glasgow Outcome Score at discharge. The drastic reduction of mortality proves there have been important advances in the treatment of pneumococcal meningitis. Nevertheless, the fact that only 44.2 % of survivors had a full recovery indicates that the search for new adjunctive treatment options must be ongoing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 54 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 11%
Student > Master 6 11%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 50%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 16 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2016.
All research outputs
#14,862,678
of 22,890,496 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,916
of 6,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,156
of 323,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#86
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,890,496 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.