You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Promoting networks between evidence-based medicine and values-based medicine in continuing medical education
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-11-39 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Myriam M Altamirano-Bustamante, Nelly F Altamirano-Bustamante, Alberto Lifshitz, Ignacio Mora-Magaña, Adalberto de Hoyos, María Teresa Ávila-Osorio, Silvia Quintana-Vargas, Jorge A Aguirre, Jorge Méndez, Chiharu Murata, Rodrigo Nava-Diosdado, Oscar Martínez-González, Elisa Calleja, Raúl Vargas, Juan Manuel Mejía-Arangure, Araceli Cortez-Domínguez, Fernand Vedrenne-Gutiérrez, Perla Sueiras, Juan Garduño, Sergio Islas-Andrade, Fabio Salamanca, Jesús Kumate-Rodríguez, Alejandro Reyes-Fuentes |
| Abstract |
In recent years, medical practice has followed two different paradigms: evidence-based medicine (EBM) and values-based medicine (VBM). There is an urgent need to promote medical education that strengthens the relationship between these two paradigms. This work is designed to establish the foundations for a continuing medical education (CME) program aimed at encouraging the dialogue between EBM and VBM by determining the values relevant to everyday medical activities. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 32% |
| Australia | 4 | 12% |
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Panama | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 26% |
| Scientists | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 113 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 18% |
| Researcher | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 26 | 22% |
| Unknown | 20 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 34% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 12% |
| Philosophy | 6 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 28 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2017.
All research outputs
#1,878,764
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,318
of 3,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,222
of 320,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#38
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.