↓ Skip to main content

Promoting networks between evidence-based medicine and values-based medicine in continuing medical education

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
35 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Promoting networks between evidence-based medicine and values-based medicine in continuing medical education
Published in
BMC Medicine, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-11-39
Pubmed ID
Authors

Myriam M Altamirano-Bustamante, Nelly F Altamirano-Bustamante, Alberto Lifshitz, Ignacio Mora-Magaña, Adalberto de Hoyos, María Teresa Ávila-Osorio, Silvia Quintana-Vargas, Jorge A Aguirre, Jorge Méndez, Chiharu Murata, Rodrigo Nava-Diosdado, Oscar Martínez-González, Elisa Calleja, Raúl Vargas, Juan Manuel Mejía-Arangure, Araceli Cortez-Domínguez, Fernand Vedrenne-Gutiérrez, Perla Sueiras, Juan Garduño, Sergio Islas-Andrade, Fabio Salamanca, Jesús Kumate-Rodríguez, Alejandro Reyes-Fuentes

Abstract

In recent years, medical practice has followed two different paradigms: evidence-based medicine (EBM) and values-based medicine (VBM). There is an urgent need to promote medical education that strengthens the relationship between these two paradigms. This work is designed to establish the foundations for a continuing medical education (CME) program aimed at encouraging the dialogue between EBM and VBM by determining the values relevant to everyday medical activities.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 100 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 18%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 25 24%
Unknown 12 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 36%
Social Sciences 13 13%
Philosophy 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 22 21%
Unknown 19 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2017.
All research outputs
#1,280,115
of 18,978,726 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#957
of 2,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,342
of 298,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,978,726 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,845 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them