You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
First do no harm: pain relief for the peripheral venous cannulation of adults, a systematic review and network meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Anesthesiology, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12871-016-0252-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mary Bond, Louise Crathorne, Jaime Peters, Helen Coelho, Marcela Haasova, Chris Cooper, Quentin Milner, Vicki Shawyer, Christopher Hyde, Roy Powell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 20% |
| Estonia | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 60% |
| Scientists | 3 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 18% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 18% |
| Unknown | 18 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 26% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 21 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,686,163
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#74
of 1,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,372
of 333,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#6
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,723 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.