↓ Skip to main content

Phylogenetic relationship between the endosymbiont “Candidatus Riesia pediculicola” and its human louse host

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phylogenetic relationship between the endosymbiont “Candidatus Riesia pediculicola” and its human louse host
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, March 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13071-022-05203-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alissa Hammoud, Meriem Louni, Dorothée Missé, Sébastien Cortaredona, Florence Fenollar, Oleg Mediannikov

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 50%
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 50%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2022.
All research outputs
#16,646,071
of 21,358,488 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#3,547
of 5,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,173
of 336,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,358,488 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them