You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Objective disease activity assessment and therapeutic drug monitoring prior to biologic therapy changes in routine inflammatory bowel disease clinical practice: TARGET-IBD
BMC Gastroenterology, February 2022
Benjamin Click, Edward L. Barnes, Benjamin L. Cohen, Bruce E. Sands, John S. Hanson, David T. Rubin, Marla C. Dubinsky, Miguel Regueiro, Derek Gazis, Julie M. Crawford, Millie D. Long
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Doctoral Student||4||24%|
|Student > Master||1||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||7||41%|
|Arts and Humanities||1||6%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||1||6%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||1||6%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 124. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2022.
All research outputs
of 23,508,125 outputs
Outputs from BMC Gastroenterology
of 1,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 441,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Gastroenterology
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,508,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,816 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.