You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Measuring factors affecting implementation of health innovations: a systematic review of structural, organizational, provider, patient, and innovation level measures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-8-22 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephenie R Chaudoir, Alicia G Dugan, Colin HI Barr |
| Abstract |
Two of the current methodological barriers to implementation science efforts are the lack of agreement regarding constructs hypothesized to affect implementation success and identifiable measures of these constructs. In order to address these gaps, the main goals of this paper were to identify a multi-level framework that captures the predominant factors that impact implementation outcomes, conduct a systematic review of available measures assessing constructs subsumed within these primary factors, and determine the criterion validity of these measures in the search articles. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 15% |
| Australia | 4 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| Spain | 3 | 9% |
| Canada | 3 | 9% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Tunisia | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 12% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | <1% |
| Canada | 5 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 4 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1145 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 211 | 18% |
| Researcher | 193 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 183 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 106 | 9% |
| Other | 62 | 5% |
| Other | 233 | 20% |
| Unknown | 203 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 271 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 177 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 136 | 11% |
| Psychology | 106 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 76 | 6% |
| Other | 162 | 14% |
| Unknown | 263 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,735,979
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#314
of 1,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,043
of 204,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#6
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.