↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of clinical trial participant patient satisfaction: a call to action

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of clinical trial participant patient satisfaction: a call to action
Published in
Trials, October 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13063-016-1616-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bethann Mangel Pflugeisen, Stacie Rebar, Anne Reedy, Roslyn Pierce, Paul J. Amoroso

Abstract

As patient satisfaction scores become increasingly relevant in today's health care market, we sought to evaluate satisfaction of the unique subset of patients enrolling in clinical trials in a research facility embedded within a community hospital system. We developed and deployed a patient satisfaction survey tailored to clinical trial patients who consented to and/or completed a clinical trial in our research institute in the prior year. The survey was distributed to 222 patients. Likert scale responses were analyzed using top box and percentile rank procedures. Correlation analysis was used to evaluate associations between the clinical trial experience and intent to return to our system for routine care. Ninety surveys were returned in the 6 months following the mailing for a 41 % response rate; the bulk of these (N = 81) were returned within 6 weeks of the mailing. The questions with the highest ranking responses were related to interactions with staff (84th percentile or higher). Fifty-one point one percent of patients (64th percentile) strongly agreed that they would seek future care in our system. Patient intent to return to the provider seen during the clinical trial was most highly correlated with intent to seek future care within our system (r = 0.54, p < 0.0001). Reasons cited for clinical trial enrollment were generally altruistic. Querying this special patient population is feasible and yields valuable insight into their experience with healthcare system-based clinical trials and the relationship between clinical trial participation and perception of the healthcare system as a desirable resource for routine medical care. We argue that this work is invaluable to the research community and submit a call to action to our peers to begin systematic evaluation of clinical trial patient satisfaction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 12 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 13%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 14 30%