You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Discrepancy between prevalence and perceived effectiveness of treatment methods in myofascial pain syndrome: Results of a cross-sectional, nationwide survey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-11-32 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Johannes Fleckenstein, Daniela Zaps, Linda J Rüger, Lukas Lehmeyer, Florentina Freiberg, Philip M Lang, Dominik Irnich |
| Abstract |
Myofascial pain is a common dysfunction with a lifetime prevalence affecting up to 85% of the general population. Current guidelines for the management of myofascial pain are not available. In this study we investigated how physicians on the basis of prescription behaviour evaluate the effectiveness of treatment options in their management of myofascial pain. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 240 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 16% |
| Researcher | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 54 | 22% |
| Unknown | 58 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 99 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 15% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 3% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 11% |
| Unknown | 63 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2013.
All research outputs
#20,182,546
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#3,611
of 4,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,826
of 166,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#21
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,028 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.