↓ Skip to main content

Participatory methods in a digital setting: experiences from the co-creation of an eHealth tool for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Participatory methods in a digital setting: experiences from the co-creation of an eHealth tool for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, March 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12911-022-01806-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Lundell, Annika Toots, Pernilla Sönnerfors, Alexandra Halvarsson, Karin Wadell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 18 64%
Researcher 2 7%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 18 64%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Unknown 5 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2022.
All research outputs
#12,909,234
of 21,436,792 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1,005
of 1,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,312
of 338,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,436,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,880 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them