↓ Skip to main content

Participatory methods in a digital setting: experiences from the co-creation of an eHealth tool for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Participatory methods in a digital setting: experiences from the co-creation of an eHealth tool for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, March 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12911-022-01806-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Lundell, Annika Toots, Pernilla Sönnerfors, Alexandra Halvarsson, Karin Wadell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 2 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 24 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 13%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Psychology 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 26 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2022.
All research outputs
#14,156,264
of 23,452,723 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1,069
of 2,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,967
of 469,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#18
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,452,723 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,020 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 469,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.