You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evidence-based ethics? On evidence-based practice and the "empirical turn" from normative bioethics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, November 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6939-6-11 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maya J Goldenberg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 97 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 24% |
| Researcher | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 21% |
| Unknown | 10 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 14% |
| Philosophy | 15 | 13% |
| Arts and Humanities | 12 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 18% |
| Unknown | 11 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,831,652
of 22,890,496 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#306
of 994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,517
of 60,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,890,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them