Title |
Picodroplet partitioned whole genome amplification of low biomass samples preserves genomic diversity for metagenomic analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Microbiome, October 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40168-016-0197-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maria Hammond, Felix Homa, Helene Andersson-Svahn, Thijs J. G. Ettema, Haakan N. Joensson |
Abstract |
Whole genome amplification (WGA) is a challenging, key step in metagenomic studies of samples containing minute amounts of DNA, such as samples from low biomass environments. It is well known that multiple displacement amplification (MDA), the most commonly used WGA method for microbial samples, skews the genomic representation in the sample. We have combined MDA with droplet microfluidics to perform the reaction in a homogeneous emulsion. Each droplet in this emulsion can be considered an individual reaction chamber, allowing partitioning of the MDA reaction into millions of parallel reactions with only one or very few template molecules per droplet. As a proof-of-concept, we amplified genomic DNA from a synthetic metagenome by MDA either in one bulk reaction or in emulsion and found that after sequencing, the species distribution was better preserved and the coverage depth was more evenly distributed across the genomes when the MDA reaction had been performed in emulsion. Partitioning MDA reactions into millions of reactions by droplet microfluidics is a straightforward way to improve the uniformity of MDA reactions for amplifying complex samples with limited amounts of DNA. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sweden | 3 | 18% |
United States | 2 | 12% |
Spain | 1 | 6% |
Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
Australia | 1 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
Slovenia | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 53% |
Scientists | 7 | 41% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 3% |
Czechia | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 75 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 18 | 23% |
Student > Master | 13 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 15% |
Unknown | 13 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 35% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 26% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 6% |
Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
Engineering | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 15 | 19% |