You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Critical evaluation of the Illumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip microarray for whole-genome DNA methylation profiling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-016-1066-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruth Pidsley, Elena Zotenko, Timothy J. Peters, Mitchell G. Lawrence, Gail P. Risbridger, Peter Molloy, Susan Van Djik, Beverly Muhlhausler, Clare Stirzaker, Susan J. Clark |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 13 | 27% |
| United States | 7 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 10% |
| Spain | 3 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 50% |
| Scientists | 21 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 848 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 843 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 179 | 21% |
| Researcher | 161 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 88 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 83 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 38 | 4% |
| Other | 104 | 12% |
| Unknown | 195 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 269 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 129 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 22 | 3% |
| Psychology | 18 | 2% |
| Other | 118 | 14% |
| Unknown | 229 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,172,824
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#857
of 4,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,220
of 330,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#22
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.