↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: A systematic review of the health and well-being impacts of school gardening: synthesis of quantitative and qualitative evidence

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: A systematic review of the health and well-being impacts of school gardening: synthesis of quantitative and qualitative evidence
Published in
BMC Public Health, October 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12889-016-3736-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heather Ohly, Sarah Gentry, Rachel Wigglesworth, Alison Bethel, Rebecca Lovell, Ruth Garside

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 12%
Arts and Humanities 2 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 12%
Decision Sciences 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2016.
All research outputs
#6,443,612
of 8,492,090 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,078
of 7,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,084
of 254,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#194
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,492,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.