↓ Skip to main content

A de novo assembly of the newt transcriptome combined with proteomic validation identifies new protein families expressed during tissue regeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
13 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A de novo assembly of the newt transcriptome combined with proteomic validation identifies new protein families expressed during tissue regeneration
Published in
Genome Biology, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/gb-2013-14-2-r16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mario Looso, Jens Preussner, Konstantinos Sousounis, Marc Bruckskotten, Christian S Michel, Ettore Lignelli, Richard Reinhardt, Sabrina Höffner, Marcus Krüger, Panagiotis A Tsonis, Thilo Borchardt, Thomas Braun

Abstract

Notophthalmus viridescens, an urodelian amphibian, represents an excellent model organism to study regenerative processes, but mechanistic insights into molecular processes driving regeneration have been hindered by a paucity and poor annotation of coding nucleotide sequences. The enormous genome size and the lack of a closely related reference genome have so far prevented assembly of the urodelian genome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 4%
United Kingdom 4 2%
Sweden 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 195 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 30%
Researcher 56 25%
Student > Master 20 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 6%
Student > Bachelor 13 6%
Other 39 18%
Unknown 12 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 131 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 19%
Neuroscience 9 4%
Computer Science 7 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 3%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 15 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2023.
All research outputs
#583,815
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#349
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,762
of 204,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#3
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.